Real Estate Expert Witness Services | Eminent Domain & Litigation Support
Defensible analysis and trial-ready testimony for Ohio attorneys. Specializing in eminent domain, property valuation, and construction disputes.
Expert Witness Services
DeVore Consulting delivers defensible real estate expert witness testimony and litigation support for attorneys navigating high-stakes eminent domain, property valuation, and construction disputes. By combining the technical expertise of a Registered Architect with the financial rigor of an MBA, we provide highest and best use analysis and quantitative modeling that withstands Daubert challenges and aggressive cross-examination. you require immediate expert witness services in Ohio or complex damage assessment nationwide, our data-driven methodology ensures your case is built on a foundation of objective, court-ready evidence.
Unlike academic experts, our testimony is grounded in current, active Development Project Management experience.
Services For Real Estate Litigation Attorneys
In the complex landscape of construction disputes, clear, authoritative, and unbiased technical insight is paramount. Our team provides specialized Expert Witness services, leveraging decades of hands-depth project experience and rigorous analytical skills to distill intricate construction claims into understandable, actionable testimony. Whether addressing design flaws, schedule delays, cost overruns, or workmanship issues, we deliver meticulous, evidence-based analysis crucial for successful litigation, arbitration, or mediation. Partner with us to ensure technical truths are articulated with precision and impact.


Why Attorneys Choose DeVore Consulting
01
A Defensible, Data-Driven Methodology.
Opposing counsel will challenge admissibility and credibility. Our approach is built to withstand both.
- Published data sources: ITE Trip Generation Manual, Marshall & Swift cost data, market studies from credible third parties
- Replicable methodology with transparent filtering criteria and documented assumptions
- No proprietary models or subjective "professional judgment" claims
- Written reports that anticipate and preempt impeachment attacks
- See how our capital markets methodology handles stigma damages and Daubert challenges.
02
Credentials Across Multiple Disciplines
Real estate disputes require fluency in architecture, finance, and development. We provide all three.
- Registered Architect: Technical construction knowledge and design review capability
- MBA in Real Estate Finance: Pro forma modeling, valuation methodology, capital markets understanding
- 20+ years development experience: Hundreds and hundreds of residential units and hundreds of thousands of SF delivered
- Courtroom testimony experience in eminent domain and construction disputes
- Can engage technical discussions with opposing traffic engineers, appraisers, and contractors
03
Strategic Case Positioning
We understand litigation strategy, not just technical analysis. Our testimony strengthens your case without creating unnecessary exposure.
- Clear scope boundaries, we don't overreach into appraiser's or traffic engineer's domain
- Coordinate with your expert team to eliminate gaps and overlaps
- Anticipate opposing arguments and neutralize them in initial reports
- Available for strategy calls during case development, not just deposition prep
- Principal involvement on every engagement, you work directly with Jay DeVore, not junior staff
Accolades
Proven leadership in delivering complex, high-stakes projects.

Nathan Sampson

Jonathan Barnes

Todd Moroz
FAQs
Is Your Project on Your Mind?
These FAQs are a starting point, but your project has specific goals, risks, and financial stakes. My role is to be your trusted guide.I protect your time and money by simplifying the process, providing experienced oversight, and preventing costly mistakes before they happen.
How do you handle Daubert challenges to your methodology?
Our methodology is built on published, peer-reviewed data sources, primarily the ITE Trip Generation Manual for traffic analysis and Marshall & Swift for construction costs. We don't rely on proprietary models or subjective "professional judgment." Every filtering criterion is quantifiable and replicable. In the highway access case, opposing counsel attempted a Daubert motion arguing our three-tier filter was "novel." The court denied it because each filter used standard traffic engineering principles applied systematically. The key is transparency: we show exactly how we arrived at every conclusion.
Consult an Expert
This information goes to a real human being. Its a great way to learn more and start the conversation without any obligation. We will never provide your personal or contact information to a 3rd party.